Cost Breakdown: In-House Hiring vs RPO
Is in-house hiring hurting your budget?
Many HR teams in Los Angeles, Denver, and Miami are discovering that Recruitment Process Outsourcing (RPO) offers faster, more cost-effective results—without the overhead.
In-House vs RPO: Quick Comparison
| Cost Factor | In-House | RPO (Curiohire) |
|---|---|---|
| Recruiter Salaries | $85K–$110K/year | Included |
| Job Boards & Tools | $2K–$6K/month | Included |
| Time-to-Hire | 45+ days | 20–25 days |
| Cost Per Hire | $6K–$12K+ | From $3,200 |
| Scalability | Limited | On-demand |
Result: DEF Staffing saved $28K per hire with Curiohire.
Where RPO Saves You Money
- ✅ Faster hiring = lower vacancy cost
- ✅ No extra spend on sourcing tools
- ✅ No internal recruiter overhead
Curiohire’s Transparent Model
- Flat-rate pricing (monthly or project-based)
- U.S.-based recruiters + sourcing tools included
- No markups, no retainers—just results
📞 Get Your ROI Report – Book a Free 30-Min Call
Know your true hiring cost—and how to reduce it.
